Reading First Brings Literacy Research and Professional Development Into the Classroom
by Linda Wacyk, Communication Specialist The soft music of metal wind chimes rings through the busy chatter in one of Milwood Elementary School’s first-grade classrooms. First-grader Ben shuts his notebook and leaps to his feet. “Oh, boy. It’s my turn for the computer,” he says.
Ben and his classmates move to “step six” in a 120-minute morning literacy block that is an everyday event in Milwood’s kindergarten through third-grade classrooms. The extended literacy time is just one component of Kalamazoo Public Schools’ Reading First program, which brings scientifically-based reading instruction and professional development into some of the district’s poorest performing K-3 classrooms (see page 9).
“Reading First has brought about massive changes in the way students are taught literacy in Kalamazoo Public Schools,” says Marlene Sadler, an “Educator on Loan” to the Michigan Depart-ment of Education. As a Reading First facilitator for the state, Sadler helps teachers in four elementary buildings in this urban southwest Michigan district improve the way they teach literacy.
“I work with teams of teachers in four schools,
and I can honestly say there’s not a single teacher who isn’t supporting this effort,” says Sadler. “It was tough at first, but once we started seeing growth in the children, it became very empowering for all of us.”
Sadler’s work is part of the Reading First initiative, which has awarded more than $21 million
to 22 Michigan school districts since 2002 (see Reading First Fact File). She’s just one of the state’s 26 Reading First facilitators who provide professional development to classroom teachers and literacy coaches, helping them use research-based best practices to help students learn to read and write.
Reading First Teachers Use Data to Drive Instruction
Reading First relies on a “trainer-of-trainers” model to bring new knowledge to teachers about how to teach literacy. Instead of going out to a daylong seminar on one aspect of reading instruction, teachers receive ongoing support right where they work—in the classroom.
“One of the main differences with Reading
First is that teachers are learning to use a continual cycle of assessment, evaluation, planning, and instruction in the classroom,” says Sadler. “This means they are getting much better at using data to inform instruction.”
Sadler trains and oversees the work of literacy coaches—one in each building—who collaborate with classroom teachers to plan differentiated instruction for students, based on students’ individual strengths and needs. Coaches also facilitate weekly grade level meetings, during which teachers discuss new ways to approach challenges their students face.
Kathryn Catherman serves as literacy coach to Milwood’s teachers. A former second-grade Reading First teacher herself, Catherman analyzes student data for 215 students, models teaching strategies for teachers and paraprofessionals, and supports teachers in the classroom.
“Reading First is the most organized approach we’ve had to teaching reading,” says Catherman. “It looks at intervention in a systematic way for
at-risk populations. We haven’t done that before.”
Milwood principal Charles Pearson agrees. “Reading First has helped us to focus. It’s the ‘whole package,’” he says. “It has easy-to-use materials, teacher support, classroom management, and organization—it’s all there.”
New Methods and Technologies Boost Student Interest—and Achievement
If nearly two hours of literacy instruction seems like too much “seat time” for young learners, think again. At Milwood, students are on the move and engaging all their senses. In Ben’s first-grade classroom, small groups of students make the rounds of literacy workstations set up throughout the room.
Ben’s group takes a turn at three computer
stations, where students put headphones on and play literacy games that follow up on lessons from their reading textbooks. Other groups build words out of letter groups with teacher Michelle Mallory, read aloud to a teacher intern, or work independently practicing the week’s spelling words. On this particular Friday, a favorite station is manned by the class’s paraprofessional, Cathy McAllister. Her small group gathers to review words by writing them in puddles of sweet-smelling shaving cream. Despite the students’ squeals of delight, Catherman points out there’s some serious learning going on. Each stop in the round of workshops has been carefully planned in advance by the classroom teacher, who regroups students as their needs change.
Some Key Components of Reading First Programs in Kalamazoo Public Schools:
- Use of a core reading program (Kalamazoo uses Harcourt-Brace).
- Use of DIBELS Benchmark assessment
for screening purposes (see page 11).
- Whole group/small group model of
instruction.
- Continual re-grouping of students based on monitoring and assessment.
- Student work stations for direct application and practice.
- Differentiated instruction based on assessed student strengths and weaknesses.
- Weekly grade-level teacher meetings.
- Literacy coaches for support in each building.
- State-hired facilitator for every five buildings.
- At least 50 hours of professional develop-
ment per year for teachers and principals.
|
“This is very data-driven,” says Catherman. “Interventions are carefully planned to match what we learn from assessments and observation. It takes a lot of work on the teacher’s part, but the results we’re seeing are worth it.”
Reading First Builds Teamwork
Pearson reports that the first year was hard on teachers because they were expected to approach literacy instruction in new ways. “When I first started as a teacher, I went to my classroom, closed my door, and worked pretty much alone,” says Pearson. “With Reading First, you’re not alone, you’re part of a team. It’s stressful in some ways, but on a good day, most of our teachers would say it’s a better way to work. This year is easier for them, and I expect results to be even better.”
All this collaboration is producing results at Milwood. At the end of the program’s first year,
assessment results show progress among some of the school’s most at-risk students, and reading achievement is up overall.
“When we started the program, Reading First schools were the poorest-scoring schools in the district,” says Catherman. “Now our first-graders are outscoring students in non-Reading First schools in the word analysis sections of the Iowa Test of Basic Skills.”
Students like Ben, however, measure achievement
a little differently. When asked what he’s going to do with all the new spelling words he’s mastered, Ben doesn’t hesitate for a moment.
“It’s what I’m going to be when I grow up—an author,” he says. “I’m going to sell my books to the school library.”
With the backing of Kalamazoo’s Reading First team, it looks like Ben might be well on his way to reaching that goal.
Reading First
Fact File
Reading First is a federal grant that is Subpart B of Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. A basic premise of Reading First is that ALL of America’s students—with the exception of students who have severe cognitive delays—can learn to read well by the end of third grade with instruction that is tailored to their needs.
Michigan’s Reading First plan has the following priorities:
- Implementing high quality research-based
reading programs.
- Using reliable and valid assessment tools
to effectively screen and monitor reading
progress and diagnose reading difficulties.
- Offering high quality professional development to ensure that ALL K-3 teachers and
K-12 special education teachers have the
skills necessary to teach effectively.
- Strengthening school leadership and infrastructure to focus, coordinate, and sustain
efforts that result in literacy achievement.
- Any programs funded through Reading First must be designed using scientifically-based reading research (SBRR) (see page 11) and include five essential components of reading instruction:
- Phonemic awareness—the ability to focus on
and manipulate the smallest units of sound
in spoken language.
- Explicit phonics—the relationship between
the letters of written language and the
sounds of spoken language.
- Vocabulary development—the stored
information about the meaning and
pronunciation of words.
- Oral reading fluency—the ability to read
accurately, quickly, and with expression.
- Reading comprehension—the ability to
understand or gain meaning from text.
States apply for Reading First funds, which the federal government awards for a six-year period (depending on federal appropriations and continuing state progress). Michigan was among the first states in the nation to receive funds and is eligible to receive $28.4 million dollars per year for up to six years.
Reading First funds are spent at two levels:
- Eighty percent go to qualifying local school
districts based on competitive grants. Eligible
districts must meet the following criteria:
Have at least 40 percent (or at least 50
students) failing the fourth grade Michigan
Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) reading test and, additionally, have one
of the following:
- At least 15 percent (or 1,000 students)
living below poverty level or location in a
geographic area designated as an
Empowerment Zone or Enterprise
Community.
- Have at least 50 percent (or at least 8
buildings) in school improvement status
for reading.
- Twenty percent fund state-level activities,
such as administration, program evaluation, technical assistance, expanded
opportunities for K-3 students, and professional development.
|
To learn more about Reading First in Kalamazoo Public Schools, contact: Marlene Sadler, Milwood Elementary School, 3400 Lovers Lane, Kalamazoo, MI 49001, (269) 337-0690, mar243@juno.com or Kathryn Catherman, (269) 337-0660, cathermanks@kalamazoo.k12.mi.us.
TOP of the Page
|